Skip to main content

A Village Burnt Overnight: Tears, Loss and Survival in Dhamangaon Blaze

By
  Sitting amid the blackened remains of his home, 32-year-old Nikesh Gawali carefully broke open a half-melted plastic box with a screwdriver. His hands shook slightly, not out of fear, but out of hope. “I’m trying to find my daughter Aarti’s gold earrings,” he said quietly, still focused on the box. “She’s just five. I got them made recently after months of labour work.” The plastic box, warped and blackened by heat, was one of the few things left from his two-room house on the outskirts of Dhamangaon village . All around him lay ash, broken tin sheets and charred wooden beams. The walls had cracked under the heat and the front room’s tin roof had caved in completely. What remained was a blackened debris all around - almost nothing to suggest a home once stood there. Nikesh earns his living as an agricultural labourer, like many in the village. Work is uncertain and depends on the season. Those earrings weren’t just jewellery - they were a small dream, a reward for his hard work,...
Post a Comment

HC directs Union and State govts to file their affidavits in PIL about permanent Regional Bench of National Consumer Commission at Nagpur

Image
By
Nagpur High Court

The Division of Justice Sunil Shukre and Justice G A Sanap at the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court directed the Union Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Maharashtra Government to file their affidavits in response to the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) about permanent Regional Bench of National Consumer Commission at Nagpur.
The PIL was filed by the NGO Citizens Forum for Equality through its President Madhukar Ganpat Kukde and Consumer Court Advocates Association, Nagpur through its President Adv. Anuradha Deshpande.
The PIL demanded a permanent Regional Bench of National Consumer Commission at Nagpur and challenged the validity of rule 6 of the Consumer Rules 2020 made by the State Government of Maharashtra under section 102 of the consumer protection act 2019. The petitioners have also demanded that the present Members and President of Consumer Commissions be granted “extension of tenure” on the backdrop of increasing vacancies and increasing pendency of cases.
The petitioners have stated that a large number of consumers and litigants across Maharashtra are suffering due to huge pendency of cases at the National Commission and they are required to travel to New Delhi for their hearing, spending a lot of time, energy and money.
The Regional Bench/ Circuit Bench can be notified by the Central Govt u/s 53 (2) of CP Act 2019. The Petitioners have sent the representations to the central government and demanded a “permanent regional bench at Nagpur” to bring justice at the door step of the consumers in the State of Maharashtra and nearby states but the request to notify regional bench under section 53 (2) of Consumer protection act 2019 is not yet acted upon in spite of two years of new act.
The petitioners have stated that the Central Government has already constituted 17 benches of NCLT and 21 benches of CAT in India, hence for the benefit of consumers all over India Regional Benches of NCDRC must be constituted.
The petitioners have pointed out the huge pendency of 70,000 cases in all District Commissions in the State of Maharashtra and 40,000 cases in State Commission.
It was pointed out by the council for the petitioners Dr Tushar Mandlekar that Central government has failed to make new rules for appointment of the Members and President of the state commission and the District commission as directed by the High Court on September 09, 2021 and hence no appointment could be done in last two years in Maharashtra. There are 16 vacant posts of the President of District Consumer commission, and 16 posts of Members in District Commission in the entire State of Maharashtra.
Adv Dr. Tushar Mandlekar assisted by Adv. Tejas Fadnavis argued for the petitioners. Assistant Solicitor General of India Adv. Nandesh Deshpande argued for the Central Government and Adv. Khan argued for the state government. The High Court has directed the counsel for the respondents to take instructions and file reply affidavits within 4 weeks in response to the present public interest litigation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IGP Prasanna : The man who stopped Obama’s convoy

By
IGP Mallikarjuna Prasanna By Dheeraj Fartode  Published on Feb/17/2019 NOT many are aware of an episode during the then US President Barack Obama’s visit to India in 2010. The world’s most powerful man was made to wait for 11 minutes in his car while an Indian cop took on American officials for their unwarranted interference in the US President’s security. KM Mallikarjuna Prasanna, Special Inspector General of Police of Nagpur Range, still continues to work with the same pride, wearing his patriotism on the sleeve. “Had they (Americans) deployed their personnel for area security, then the message would have been Indians are unable to protect VIPs in their nation,” recounted Prasanna on the episode that is one of the highlights of his distinguished career of a skillful investigator. The story of the IPS officer of 2000 batch is worth a film. In fact, a movie (Nagarjun-starrer ‘Officer’) has already been made by Ram Gopal Verma last year. His real life script als...
9 comments
Read more

DCP Sunil Kolhe gets IPS cadre

By
DCP (crime) Sunil Kolhe By Dheeraj Fartode About 28 State Police Service (SPS) officers were granted  Indian Police Service (IPS) cadre on Monday. At Nagpur, Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) (Crime) Sunil Kolhe is among these officers. With their promotion, Maharashtra Government will fill-up the existing vacancies of cadre posts across the State. The Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), Government of India, approved the promotion and Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), issued the notification of 28 state police officers into IPS cadre.  Maharashtra Government had earlier empanelled the 28 officers for promotion of SPS officers into IPS and criteria was they should have served for atleast eight years as Superintendent of Police (SP) or Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP). The list includes names of officers belonging to Deputy Superintendent of Police (Dy.SP) batches between 1988 and 1995, who were promoted to the IPS cadre. The officers are S V Ja...
Post a Comment
Read more

How a mom won fight for justice after 15 years

By
Pintu Shirke  THE love of a mother can move mountains. But for Vijaya Dilipsingh Shirke the task ahead was much tougher. She was taking on the mountain of a corrupt system, enduring threats to life, and fighting the might of muscle power. Never did she flinch even once, and after a longdrawn legal battle of 15 years ensured that the killers of her son did not go unpunished. After all, it was a resolute mother’s promise to her  slain son. On October 31, 2017 the mother was full of anxiety waiting for a word about the outcome of hearing in the Apex Court. The decision would have a bearing on the Shirkes’ years of struggle to get justice for their slain son Swapnil alias Pintu Shirke. When the learned Apex Court judges threw out challenge of main culprits, including prime plotter Vijay Mate, and upheld life sentence handed out by the High Court, the 15-yearlong fight of Vijaya Shirke had finally reached its logical conclusion. “The promise made to Swapnil when...
2 comments
Read more