With the seizure of 28 illegal fire-arms and 57 cartridges, registration of 4,712 liquor cases, and a sharp rise to 862 NDPS cases , the Nagpur Rural Police delivered one of their toughest crackdowns on crime in 2025. Along with this, preventive action was taken against 2,178 accused involved in illegal activities. Large-scale operations against crime and unlawful businesses led to seizures worth Rs 7.7 crore by the police during the year. Preventive action against 1,496 According to official records, preventive action under Section 126 of the BNSS increased sharply from 569 cases in 2024 to 1,496 cases in 2025 which marked a 163 per cent rise. Preventive actions under Section 129 BNSS also increased from 1,644 cases to 1,965 cases. Violations of preventive bonds rose from 85 cases in 2024 to 201 cases in 2025, and fines recovered through courts jumped from Rs 11,600 to Rs 23,66,200. The number of externed accused increased from 42 to 106, while detentions under the...
The Division Bench of the Bombay High Court-Nagpur on Friday pronounced the Judgment in the sensational murder case of Mohd. Irshad and allows appeal of accused in the case.
Mohd. Irshad and Mohd. Ejaz were attacked in Akola town in July 2012. Mohd. Irshad was succumbed to the injuries as he was inflicted with 43 lethal injuries. On the basis of complaint lodged by the Mohd. Ejaz, Mohd. Munaf, his real brother and cousins were arrayed as accused.
The four arrested accused were put to trail and two more accused also surrendered after some time and they were also tried in the same trial. The complainant side was represented by the battery of lawyers from Akola including Adv. Navrangabadi, besides the public prosecutor Vinod Fate. The prosecution examined several witnesses including four alleged eye-witnesses who all supported the prosecution and named all the accused and identified the accused before the Court.
The then Additional District & Sessions Judge Akola, V N Tambi held them guilty for murder and had convicted the accused and sentenced them to suffer Life Imprisonment on March 30, 2016.
The accused ultimately moved the High Court in an appeal after their final conviction and the accused contended that the versions of the alleged eye witnesses could not be relied upon and even the presence of the said witnesses on the spot was suspect. The Division Bench consisting of Justice B.R. Gavai & Justice Kum. I. K Jain held the accused to be not guilty of the offences and thus set aside the Lifer imposed upon them at Trial while allowing the appeals.
Adv. Avinash Gupta assisted by Adv. R.K Tiwari, Aakash Gupta represented the accused at the Trial as well as in the high court. Adv. M.J. Khan APP represented the State. The complainant was represented by Adv. R.J. Mirza.
Comments
Post a Comment